Back to BlogCredit Analytics

Building Credit Scoring Models with Machine Learning

From traditional logistic regression to gradient boosting—how statistical foundations enhance ML model development for credit risk assessment.

DM
Debjani Mukhopadhyay
September 2024 · 9 min read

Credit scoring is where traditional statistics meets modern machine learning. The fundamental task—predicting probability of default—has been approached with logistic regression for decades. Modern ML techniques can improve predictive power, but the statistical foundations remain essential for model interpretability and regulatory compliance.

The Logistic Regression Foundation

Logistic regression remains the workhorse of credit scoring for good reasons: interpretable coefficients, well-understood behavior, and regulatory acceptance. The log-odds formulation provides intuitive scorecards where each variable contributes additively to the credit score.

Feature Engineering from Statistics

The most impactful improvements often come from feature engineering rather than model complexity:

  • Weight of Evidence (WOE) transformation for optimal binning
  • Information Value (IV) for feature selection
  • Interaction terms identified through statistical testing
  • Time-based features capturing behavioral trends

Gradient Boosting for Credit

Gradient boosting models (XGBoost, LightGBM) can capture non-linear relationships and interactions automatically. However, they require careful handling in credit contexts:

  • Monotonicity constraints to ensure logical relationships
  • SHAP values for local interpretability
  • Out-of-time validation to detect concept drift
  • Ensemble with logistic regression for stability

Model Validation

Statistical rigor is essential in model validation. Beyond AUC-ROC, we emphasize KS statistic, Gini coefficient, population stability index (PSI), and characteristic stability analysis. These metrics ensure the model performs consistently across different populations and time periods.

A slightly less accurate model that is stable and interpretable is often better than a complex model with marginally higher accuracy but unknown failure modes.

Related Topics

Credit RiskMachine LearningStatistical ModelingLogistic Regression
DM

Debjani Mukhopadhyay

Founder, Solvexon

PG Diploma in Applied Statistics from ISI Kolkata, BSc Economics (Hons) from MIT. 9+ years of experience combining quantitative methods with practical financial applications.

Want to Discuss These Ideas?

We'd love to hear your thoughts and explore how we can help.